The “right-to-own”?

The government’s recent white paper on the English housing market has been criticised for being too timid. This is partly due to the lack of movement on allowing more green belt development – a fair point, but it still looks like tinkering at the edges.

Also, the move to improve renting will come to nothing without imposing proper rent controls on the market, something very few seem prepared to do. The fact remains if (and it is a big if) you can save up enough for a deposit it is usually cheaper to pay a monthly mortgage than monthly rent. Not to mention the obvious fact that owning a property gives you a huge financial leg up and can be the basis of long-term financial stability.

So making the rental market slightly easier is, in fact, a huge admission of defeat by the government. From a political point of view, it is also a huge miscalculation and an abandonment of the middle ground of politics. The government has an open goal to shoot at – by doing more to provide affordable homes to younger people they could lock-in the next generation of solid Tory votes. The fact remains, those you own their property are more likely to vote Conservative. Simply because there is currently no real opposition should not mean the Tory party free-wheeling up to the next general election.

There does need to be a radical change in government policy, and we do mean radical.

1. A tax system that actively discourages residential property investment for the purpose of renting, whether carried out by individuals or companies. It should become financial suicide to own more than one home, (this includes second homes).

2. Homes that are purchased and not lived in should be similarly taxed. This is a particular problem in London but is growing elsewhere in the country. Overseas buyers who buy a property to rent out or just to use as a safe deposit box are not investing in this country. If they were to move here and live here full-time, they would be investing their personal futures in the UK – and that would be very welcome.

We have to stop looking at residential property as an investment it is bad for our economy. The money would be better used investing in companies and even the stock market. Money should be put to work not tied up in housing.

Also concentrating house ownership into fewer hands creates a greater economic imbalance in society, and that has a long-term detrimental effect. More people need to own their homes and think like homeowners. These same people will spend money renovating and furnishing their homes putting money back into the economy. This has to be a good thing.

We just have to get on with being bold and brave; sadly there seems to be a lack of political will to do the unthinkable. Fine words on the steps of number 10 need to be put into radical action. This must be the radical “right-to-buy” of our age.

The “right-to-own”?

It has political masterstroke written all over it.

Posted in gov.uk, Housing, Public Policy | Comments Off on The “right-to-own”?

Brexit Lessons

It looks like we are going for a hard Brexit, was there likely to be any other kind?

Regardless of how you voted, knowing how we are going to leave is good news for all of us.

However, we also have to recognise that the warnings from the failed “project fear” as now starting to appear. A falling pound and higher inflation and increased uncertainty in the jobs market – all when we have only started the real recovery from the recession.

There are also dire warnings that GDP will be lower in 10 years time than if we had stayed in the EU.

Brassed off
With all the economic news and forecasting it is easy to forget the real reasons people voted for Brexit. Immigration got the blame because it was an easy target for the right & alt-right and a convenient way to blame others and stoke some hate. People did vote due to immigration, but immigration was caused by a steady recovery in the UK economy, unlike some other European countries – basically caused by good news.

The main reason people voted Brexit was that they were tired of bearing the brunt. Tired of years of recession with less job security, lower pay and few pay increases, where the minimum wage is the maximum wage and for the unlucky – redundancies. It was a cynical lie to state we are in this together. Some have recovered fully from the recession because it hardly touched them, but the majority have suffered. The only factor that prevented things from being worse was ultra-low interest rates for those with any form of debt. Short and long-term borrowing mitigated the drop in living standards. But, this is clearly not sustainable, and people are rightly still brassed off.

But, they are not brassed off by a so-called loss of sovereignty or fretting over the European Court of Justice – that is the burden that must be borne by Old Etonians who have the time and privilege to worry about such things.

For people who have to work, they worry about things such as short-term contracts, zero hours contracts, agency work contracts – the increasing commoditization of work – and them, that neatly coupled with ever-rising housing and living costs – a perfect storm of instability and unhappiness.

Time to deliver
Those that benefitted from and stoked Brexit now have to deliver in the real world. They have to rethink (abandon) their attachment to a flexible and competitive workforce – as these are coded words for exploitation. People want their just rewards for working – all they are asking for is to be able to live properly on what they earn.

The politicians must deliver for ordinary people – Brexiteers promised the Earth, now they must deliver it.

Oh, and slinking off to be a media pundit does not count, that is abandoning the field when the real work is just starting.

Posted in Employment law, gov.uk, Public Policy | Comments Off on Brexit Lessons

Time to protect the protectors

Two Microsoft employees are suing the company claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) caused by having to view and moderate (remove) extreme content.

The two employees, (Henry Soto and Greg Blauert) worked in the blandly titled “online safety team” at Microsoft. This vanilla team title hides the appalling nature of the work they had to undertake, on a daily basis. As part of their jobs, the two plaintiffs had to view and remove content such as extreme sexual violence, (against adults and children), bestiality, torture and murder.

The plaintiffs allege that Microsoft failed to provide sufficient psychological support, with insufficient counselling and a failure to rotate the employees out to less traumatising work. One of the employees was “involuntarily transferred” to the unit in 2008.

The injuries suffered are recognisable as PTSD – insomnia, panic attacks, visual hallucinations, disassociation and depression. They are also said to fear for the safety of their children as a result of viewing this material.

This case poses far-reaching questions for Microsoft and other tech companies who have to remove similar content. There are also allegations of poor and dangerous working conditions at other well-known companies, such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. These are all companies with sufficient resources to have in place proper controls and effective support programs.

The work carried out by these teams is incredibly important and also involves liaising with law enforcement helping to track and convict the perpetrators, and ultimately protecting others from a similar and horrible fate.

The lack of support for these workers also highlights the deep-seated cultural problems at these companies where the myth of the god-like, (white, middle-class, male) “brogrammer” holds sway. Resources, money and support are all directed at the “gods”. As important as these programmers and developers are they could not be paid/overpaid and cosseted without the everyday work of tech support, customer service and online safety teams – these are the people who run the Internet and ensure everything stays on the rails 24/7. They do the difficult day-to-day work, the gritty and grim end of the Internet – without the recognition and (more importantly) the support they deserve.

From the other end of the problem, the law and law enforcement need to step-up to meet the online threat. Law enforcement needs much greater resources to investigate and coordinate across borders and continents; prosecutors need more resources to pursue cases, regardless of location.

This is a growing problem and needs to be fought.

In the meantime, those at the grim end of this work deserve much more.

Posted in gov.uk, Public Policy, Social Media | Comments Off on Time to protect the protectors

The Gig Economy Must Go

As the government announces economic measures to help “just managing families”, we have to ask – what took the government so long?

We also have to ask how far will the government go in passing measures to help ordinary families. The whole notion of the “working poor” is obscene. If you work full-time, you should be able to afford to live, and by live, we mean what many others take for granted.

– Own your home
– Able to buy good food and pay your bills every month
– Have money left at the end of the month to save
– Have a pension
– Ability to own a car or afford public transport
– A decent summer holiday
– To have assets to pass on to your children

Some may read this list and be surprised that some do not already have this ability, but many do not, and can only dream of this lifestyle.

Gig To Go
The government must take steps to end the so-called “gig economy”. The increasing casualisation of work only serves to help employers and exploit employees. Companies such as Uber and Deliveroo shamelessly claim some special alchemy to expand and generate their profits. However, their business model relies on avoiding national insurance contributions, sick pay, holiday pay and basic employment rights. Their workers are falsely labelled “self-employed”, even though they fail every test of self-employment, and can only ever be employees. The gig economy is also a neat and devious way to undercut competitors and expand quickly, without effective controls.

Furthermore, the gig economy is growing and heading up the employment food chain from delivery people and drivers to those working in education and other professions. If the government fails to act decisively, this problem will grow, and income from national insurance contributions will continue to fall. Relying upon court cases is no longer enough; the government must act, and not allow itself to be fooled by these companies who promote the falsehood of a “flexible workforce”.

After all, if voters do not have a future or assets they do not vote Conservative – they are however easy pickings for more extreme parties and causes. Simply there is too much to lose for the government to continue to sit on its hands.

Just managing families are not looking for a free ride, far from it, they just want to be paid enough to live on.

Posted in gov.uk, Public Policy | Comments Off on The Gig Economy Must Go

Cut & Paste Convictions

So as we wake up to another day the nightmare (for most) has become our new reality – there will be President Trump.

Not only that, but President Trump will have far more power than any US President in recent memory.

The President of the United States of America, the leader of the free world, will be a man who makes disparaging remarks about the disabled and women, (and in the case of women acts out his contempt). He is also a man who openly and gleefully discriminates against people based on their race and religion.

Well, America is now getting paid back for ignoring those who have borne the brunt of the global recession, those that have seen their incomes and living standards eroded over decades, those that have seen their jobs moved abroad.

There has been much dismay and hand wringing by corporate America, particularly the tech community. Some in the tech community are now busy papering over the cracks by quoting Dr King.
Enough with the banal quotes, when Dr Martin Luther King Jr stated, “move forward” – he meant it. He meant action, not words; he meant change, not, hey-ho it might work out ok in the end.

Enough with the cut & paste convictions.

If corporate America, led by the tech industry had paid their taxes instead of hiding their income in sunny places, the federal government would not have been starved of funds. Money could have gone into road building, bridge building and other infrastructure projects and schools. The American state would have had more to invest in improving states and regions in dire need of reinvestment and renewal.

There can be no large US corporation that does not owe its founding and initial growth to the 350 million strong home market. However, these companies appear to have no problem denying the debt they owe to their fellow citizens. They seem to believe the cult and lie of individualism – that they grew solely due to their hard work and that they owe little or nothing back.

I wonder what will happen if the actions of President Trump cause widespread civil unrest and protests. Do you think the protesters will march down the streets of America, but pause to buy the latest iPhone before carrying on their protest? Or will they stride straight by the Apple store?

So enough of the lofty (but empty) quotes, stop riding on the stolen coattails of those who gave and sacrificed much more than any of us.

Negotiate a lower rate of corporate tax – 15% has been proposed by the Trump administration. Agree to the 15% and bring your entire profits home so that America can be renewed again.

Ok, so President Trump will reap all the political benefits from it – but again that is your fault for not doing it sooner. Where would we be now if corporate America had done this 4 or 8 years ago?

Probably with the first Madam President.

Posted in gov.uk, Public Policy | Comments Off on Cut & Paste Convictions

So How Is Brexit Going For You?

Now that the long and painful process of unwinding 40 years of economic co-operation and deeply integrated trade has begun – how is it going for you?

Plummeting Pound
We ask as prices for food products increase due to the plummeting value of sterling against all the other major currencies. Sterling has at the time of writing dropped 16% against the Euro, with no immediate recovery on the horizon.

We also ask against a backdrop of the British Parliament being denied a vote on the terms of Brexit – this seems deeply ironic given Brexit was dressed up as giving more power back to Parliament.

According to experts supermarket price inflation could reach 5% this year. (Those are probably the same experts derided by the foam-mouthed Brexit backers before the vote.) Price increases for some products are forecast to increase even more, with prices rises for meat of up to 25%.

Supermarket Prices
So are the Brexit voting public ready for supermarkets to raise their prices and pass on the increased costs from suppliers? Also, some supermarkets may actually stop stocking some products altogether as they are unable to agree the level of price increases with suppliers.

There are some positive (if unintended consequences of these price increases) – the “sugar tax” will not be needed, as price increases will choke demand high sugar products.

Doom Mongers
If you criticise Brexit people who saw fit to play cricket the day after the vote, rather than deal with the mess they had caused will dismiss you as a doom-monger. It may be significant to note that some politicians view Brexit as their main chance to gain power and promotion. To them politics is a game, and if you lose your job post-Brexit that is due to “economics”.

In This Together
The financial and political elite survived the recent recession largely intact; some even came out ahead. You, the ordinary voter may well pay with a fall in your living standards due to higher food prices, a lower pension as shares and investments tank and possibly less work. But remember “we are in this together” – its just there will be precious upside for you. Also, when you are told we are “leaving the EU, but not Europe”, tell that to Europe. Europe is baffled by these linguistic semantics.

Here Comes Divorce
So a costly political, economic, social and security divorce is coming – could someone please show me someone who felt better off after divorce? True, we may feel as though we have recovered after say 10 or more years, but at what cost to you and your family in those years?

Posted in gov.uk, Public Policy | Comments Off on So How Is Brexit Going For You?

Drive Like Death

Recent media reports have highlighted the extent of use of mobile phones while driving – as if we needed news items to tell us this. If you are driving (and actually driving) you can easily spot the vehicles in front whose drivers are busy doing something else. The tell-tale signs of a vehicle crossing out of its lane, not moving forward promptly in traffic queues, mounting the pavement, hitting other vehicles, cyclists or pedestrians etc. Basically risking death or serious injury to others.

When this happens and on the increasingly rare occasions someone is caught doing it re-handed the usual punishment (if any) is points or a fine. However, in most cases the driver is punished after they have already inflicted a serious injury or caused a death by their actions.

Now we have all done it at some point, glanced at our phone when we should not, even hands-free calls are distracting enough to cause an accident. Basically driving a modern vehicle on our congested roads is a job that requires our full attention, all of the time.

You’re The Product
Enter into this mix; tech companies who want more and more of our attention and data, because both are pure money to them. Apple has built software for cars to entertain and inform us, as has Google, Facebook and others. They all pay lip service to driving safety, but that is all. The simple fact is that if you are not driving with all your attention you are still driving – it is just that your mind is elsewhere.

There was a time when a cigarette, a drink or a snack distracted people, but now we must add incessant calls, texts, alerts and updates. Phones and the apps and services on them are purposefully designed to get our attention and to retain it for as long as possible – to monetise your waking hours and attention, repeatedly – this does not mix well with driving.

Pokémon Go Go
Reports of people playing Pokémon Go whilst driving tell you all you need to know. A recent study estimated tens of thousands driving and playing over a 10-day period of study. Even if the study is not statistically accurate this must mean a lot of weaving vehicles out there on the roads.

Not Addictive?
Also some argue these apps and services are not addictive – ask that to the politicians caught playing them at work, most recently the Prime Minister of Norway.

Class Action Go
So as we proceed down the road to further distractions there will come a time when enough people will be seriously injured or killed by others for the victims or their families to seek redress from the tech companies (and possibly vehicle manufacturers). This seems almost inevitable. Governments can run as many safety campaigns and tighten laws all they want, with little or no enforcement the chances of being caught are slim. In the end those that have suffered will go after the biggest pockets to seek compensation.

Posted in gov.uk, Public Policy, Social Media, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Drive Like Death

America You Can Thank Europe Later

So the Apple tax row and subsequent defence continues.

Though it is quite hard to defend a tax rate equivalent to £50 for every £1million of profit.

The argument made by some is that this is a retrospective change in the law. Frankly this argument is laughable. Apple deliberately created a wholly artificial corporate structure, (with help from the Irish government) with the sole purpose of avoiding or limiting their tax liability. However, the actions of the Irish government have been ruled to amount to state aid direct to Apple – so breaching EU competition law.

Retro Non
There is no retrospective action here. Apple must have known there was some risk in the future that their bizarre corporate structure in Europe would be unpicked and shown for what it is. To counter that this is retrospective is to say that an avoider can avoid tax and avoid the consequences of their avoidance too – basically tax laws and regulations do not apply and are useless.

For all the thinly veiled threats from the US Treasury, there must be some in the US government that welcome this development.

Political Paralysis
It does speak volumes about the state of political paralysis in the US that it took a relatively unknown EU Commissioner, Magrethe Vestager to spark political debate and possible reform of US corporate tax law. After all if the US is unwilling or unable to effectively tax US companies the EU and others will. It could now become a race to see who can get the most from these companies – as Apple is far from unique in their tax arrangements.

Regarding US corporate tax rates – 35% to 40% is ridiculously high, compared to the UK main rate of 20%. The US should move their tax rates down to make them more competitive and in turn collect more tax. Though reducing rates may not make this happen. What needs to be done by the US is to tax the large amounts held overseas by US companies. That can be done by changing US tax law or by forcing US companies to on-shore their massive reserves.

US Needs The Money
We can forget the philosophical or political arguments about taxation. The US government needs the money. The transport infrastructure in the US is crumbling, and has been for years. The US needs to invest in all forms of transport, education, health, and even faster broadband rates. Simply put better transport links help to generate jobs in their construction and jobs in the regeneration of areas with improved links.

Apple and other US companies benefit hugely from the US domestic market – even if they don’t pay taxes where they sell, for example Europe – they should pay full taxes where they are based on what they sell outside the US.

Trump
For those who argue against tax – one word – Trump.

When those that can, avoid tax the US government has less money to run the country, investment in the future and maintaining the present becomes that much harder – the government of the people, by the people, for the people – perishes.

Into that vacuum steps the ultimate carpetbagger Donald Trump promising a toxic change and threatening America’s very place in the world – also someone who has yet to release his own tax records.

So when Tim Cook pleads innocence and even outrage he (and many others) should know the long-term consequences of their actions.

No one likes to pay tax, but Apple needs to decide whether it is an American company or an offshore outfit.

Posted in gov.uk, Public Policy | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on America You Can Thank Europe Later

Can Do Nation

The Rio Olympics have provided a much-needed boost to the nation’s confidence and outlook. Our outstanding success is not magical or mysterious – it is down to cash and long-term investment in elite sport. The investment has been made possible by successive governments (of all hues) continuing support for elite sport. The role played by the National Lottery has also been absolutely key to the success.

The lessons that can be taken from this success are as follows:

1. Long-term investment is key to any continued success and staying competitive. For society this means increased investment in UK education at all levels. For business it means moving away from being held hostage every quarter by those investors and the City who unfortunately both obsess about short-term gains, to the absolute detriment of long-term strength.

2. We all need to work together. For those that sit and crow about our successes and how we don’t need Europe or bloody foreigners – to those I give you Mohamed Muktar Jama Farah CBE, born Mogadishu, Somalia. Who came to the UK aged eight and settled in West London. Our Mo had a connection to the UK and that is why he settled here. However, he could just as easily have settled elsewhere – Sweden (or any country with a generous migration policy) could have had him as their national treasure – much to our loss.

I also give you Nicola Adams MBE, black, bisexual and brilliant, the first woman to win an Olympic boxing title.

Basically if someone is good enough to wear the colours and compete for our country – they are more than good enough.

We can (and absolutely must) encourage and offer real life chances to everyone. Diversity of talent, outlook, experience, gender, sexuality and ethnicity are our absolute strengths in a globalised world. If we are to interact, co-operate and trade with the world we must reflect that world.

Moving away from sport – we now have a Muslim Mayor of London, the son of a bus driver. There is real power in that message – we need to do more to encourage talent from all corners of our society.

So to those Brexit voters who voted for control of our borders who voted against foreigners – you have lost the argument, (though you thought you had won it). As we will soon be outside Europe we must be much more (not less) open to the world. We have to recruit and retain the best and those who could have the potential to be the best, or those that can make a valuable contribution to our society, without being famous.

3. We finish by going back to business. The Olympics show the need for outright competition – the best on the day will win. For business we need to increase competition and reduce potential monopolies. Lobbying and influence must give way to straightforward and raw competition.

For those that win there is also a need to give back, so that others may benefit. Elite sportsmen and women understand that – that is why so many stay in their respective sports long after their competitive careers have ended.

Brand Britain
It was never about just medal tallies – it was and always will be about Brand Britain and what binds us together so that we can show a united story to the rest of a watching world – and the world is watching us, now more than ever.

It is time we all stepped up to the blocks to be the best we can be.

Posted in gov.uk, Public Policy | Comments Off on Can Do Nation

Scalping Gone Legit?

So the recent government report into online ticket touting and scalping makes some useful recommendations, but is far too timid.

Scalping and touting is where a third party buys a large number of tickets in order to resell them at an inflated price, basically creating a secondary market for the tickets. The argument for their existence is that they take the risk of buying tickets, and so should be able to profit from this. Clearly this argument is rubbish – there is not much risk in buying tickets to see Radiohead, Coldplay or 1D.

The report rightly criticises the major ticket sites, such as Ticketmaster. Ticketmaster could easily implement restrictions to prevent mass buying, frequently done in an automated way by so-called bots. Obviously, any action taken by the ticket sites will meet a determined response from the scalpers, but action must be taken.

The artists in question could also take action by refusing to allocate tickets to the major ticket sites. We believe that artists should do this because at this stage of the process they have considerable leverage and power. However, that leverage and power simply vanishes once they give ticket allocations over to these sites.

Rather than the Internet putting scalpers out of business it has allowed them to flourish and expand. This is also because secondary ticket sites have provided an efficient means of disposing of tickets, again taking their own undeserved cut. These sites drone on about helping legitimate fans buy & sell tickets, but this is rubbish. They exist to serve the scalper market.

The government report dismissed closing these sites down as it would force the trade underground. Again this is utter rubbish. These sites allow scalpers to scale up and increase their sales and profit. There is no longer the need to stand outside Wembley muttering that you have tickets for sale. If forcing this trade off the Internet is forcing it “underground” – then good – do it.

The government should legislate to prevent the sale of tickets above their face value. This would curtail or remove the trade quite quickly.

Obviously the government tout the usual free-market rubbish about ticket prices – let the market decide etc. Maybe we are being too cynical, but MPs get complimentary tickets to lots of events anyway.
Also, the wider and much more important argument is that the citizens of this country and being priced out of their own culture. Bit by bit ordinary members of the public are being denied simple pleasures, because they simply cannot afford them. (Leave aside the more important aspects of life such as housing & education.)

Unfortunately the government lives in another world where there is more money, but money is not even needed – as tickets come free.

While we wait for the government to act may we recommend Twickets

Just to add we think that artists should act now. Allocating tickets to sites that limit sales per person (or bot) would be a good move.

Maybe a major artist should talk to a site such as Twickets about creating a selling platform for new tickets with built-in restrictions to prevent mass purchases. The major artists have more than enough muscle to move ticket sales to where they want – the fans will simply follow, because they want the tickets.

For artists it is vital to keep, nurture and maintain a large and diverse fan base. Being able to see an artist perform live is a cornerstone of being a true fan – and artists know the true fans sustain you throughout your career – just ask Take That.

Posted in Consumer Law, Public Policy | Comments Off on Scalping Gone Legit?